Kraft Heinz withdraws bid for Unilever, citing 'amicable agreement'

Kraft Heinz withdraws bid for Unilever, citing ‘amicable agreement’

American food giant Kraft Heinz on Sunday abandoned its efforts to take over Anglo Dutch peer Unilever. The two conglomerates issued a joint press statement stating that ‘Unilever and Kraft Heinz hereby announce that Kraft Heinz has amicably agreed to withdraw its proposal for a combination of the two companies.’ ‘Unilever and Kraft Heinz hold each other in high regard,’ the statement continued. ‘Kraft Heinz has the utmost respect for the culture, strategy and leadership of Unilever.’ On Friday, Unilever rejected the €130bn takeover bid made by Kraft Heinz, stating that the offer of $50 a share, made up of $30.23 in cash and the rest in stock, ‘fundamentally undervalues’ the company. No merit ‘Unilever rejected the proposal as it sees no merit, either financial or strategic, for Unilever’s shareholders. Unilever does not see the basis for any further discussions,’ the Anglo Dutch group said in a statement. Kraft Heinz is backed by Brazil’s 3G and Warren Buffett. The offer ‘set the stage for a battle between two of the largest consumer goods companies in the world’, the Financial Times said. Kraft Heinz spokesman Michael Mullen told the New York Times: 'Kraft Heinz’s interest was made public at an extremely early stage. Our intention was to proceed on a friendly basis, but it was made clear Unilever did not wish to pursue a transaction.' 'It is best to step away early so both companies can focus on their own independent plans to generate value,' he said.  More >

Wilders pulls out of second tv debate

Wilders pulls out of second tv debate, calls broadcaster RTL ‘scum’ PVV leader Geert Wilders on Sunday pulled out of a second televised election debate, describing one of the organising broadcasters as ‘unbelievable lowlife scum’. The debate, which will take place in the Carre theatre on March 5, was to have featured the eight biggest parties in the opinion polls. The debate, which will still go ahead without Wilders, is organised by RTL Nieuws, BNR radio and current affairs magazine Elsevier. Wilders said via Twitter that he would not take part in the debate. ‘Bye Bye RTL,’ Wilders said, before going on to restate he would be at two other debates on March 13 and 14. Last week, Wilders pulled out of another RTL debate featuring the main prime ministerial candidates because five not four parties had been invited to take part. Prime minister Mark Rutte also withdraw from that debate. Brother Wilders did not say why he had pulled out of the second debate but had earlier sent out an angry tweet denouncing RTL’s interview with his older brother Paul. ‘What unbelievably lowlife scum RTL is to bring my family into the campaign,’ Wilders said. ‘Disgusting.’ In the interview with RTL, Paul Wilders said the PVV leader will not accept any opposition, whether family or not, and rules his world like an emperor. The two brothers, he said, have hardly spoken since Paul sent out a tweet apologising for his brother's tweet featuring Angela Merkel with bloody hands. Death threats His opposition to Geert has also brought him death threats, most recently from a group of men who said they would 'take care' of him after the election. 'As if a PVV election victory would legitimise something like that,' he told RTL. RTL news editor Harm Taselaar said in a reaction that he was extremely sorry Wilders had pulled out of the debate. The interview with his brother was completely justified, Taselaar said, because of the threats which had been made against him. Wat een ongelooflijk laaghartig tuig is @RTLnieuws om mijn familie bij de campagne te betrekken. Walgelijk. — Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) February 19, 2017   More >

The big election issues: immigration

The big election issues: immigration and integration The Netherlands goes to the polls to elect a new government on March 15. is taking a close look at the five big issues dominating the campaign: healthcare, immigration, Europe, the elderly and housing. Part 3: immigration No issue has generated as much noise and division in the Dutch election as immigration. The tension on the issue may have eased since the peak of the Syrian refugee crisis, when communities such as Geldermalsen had to abandon plans to build asylum accommodation centres in the face of heated and sometimes violent public protest. But there remains a growing fear that society is becoming polarised and minorities are failing to integrate, either through lack of will or lack of opportunity. Almost all parties believe there is a problem, but the solutions they propose differ widely. Unsurprisingly, the PVV makes immigration its flagship policy. Almost one-third of its one-page programme for government is taken up by its plans to 'de-Islamise' the Netherlands. Geert Wilders would not just prevent new mosques from being built, but close existing ones, along with Islamic schools, ban the Koran and outlaw headscarves for public officials. Mainstream Such policies go a long way to explaining why Wilders is almost certain to be locked out of the next government, but they have left their mark on more mainstream parties. The VVD has hardened its stance on both asylum and immigration: last week the party said it wanted to toughen up the criteria for admitting new migrants, who will now have to prove they can speak Dutch and have found a job (paid or unpaid) in order to pass their integration test. The party also wants to extend the time period before new residents can apply for a Dutch passport from five years to 10. This measure is also proposed by 50Plus, which wants migrants to obtain 'proof of good behaviour' from the local council before they can become citizens. The Christian Democrats (CDA) favour a carrot-and-stick approach: better access to language classes and measures to tackle discrimination, but migrants who refuse to take part in integrations should lose their right to stay in the country. Other parties on the right want to restrict migration either by making it harder for failed asylum seekers to appeal and restricting the right to family reunion (SGP) or introducing an Australian-style system which only admits migrants who are needed for the economy (VNL). Not in Europe The VVD, SGP and 50Plus are among several parties that call for asylum seekers to be housed in neighbouring countries rather than travel to Europe. The VVD argues this will counter the power of human traffickers who prey on migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean. Many parties say Europe's external borders should be better policed to stop economic migrants coming in. This includes the likes of PvdA and D66, who argue that economic migration undermines public support for genuine refugees. PvdA leader Lodewijk Asscher has made his 'participation contract', which new arrivals would have to sign or risk a fine, a cornerstone of his integration policy. Language classes are one of the issues that splits the parties. While the VVD argues that providing language tuition acts as a pull factor, D66, the ChristenUnie (CU) and GreenLeft all say they is key to helping new migrants settle quickly and should be available from day one. D66 and the CU would also lower the barriers that prevent asylum seekers working or volunteering. Denk also supports allowing asylum seekers to work or study earlier. Development aid GroenLinks, the pro-animal PvdD and the Socialist Party (SP) all advocate increasing spending on development aid to stabilise war-torn regions and stem the flow of refugees at the source. By contrast, the PVV would cut the development budget altogether. The status of children is another issue that several parties raise in their manifestos: GroenLinks and the PvdA want judges to be able to consider their situations separately rather than automatically tie their cases to their parents. One issue on which just about all parties agree is that the asylum procedure should be speeded up, either to ensure that rejected asylum seekers are sent home quickly, or to remove the uncertainty for those who are allowed to stay and let them get on with building their new lives. The CU says that anyone who has been waiting for a year to be sent home, but is unable to leave for reasons beyond their control, should be given permission to stay. At the opposite pole from the PVV is Denk, which rejects the whole notion of integration in favour of 'acceptance' of migrants within the community. The migrants' rights party would also train 1,000 police officers to specialise in handing racist incidents and keep specific records of racism and discrimination. Party programmes PVV – No more asylum seekers, close all refugee centres and revoke all permits to stay in the country. No immigration from Muslim countries, close all mosques and Islamic schools and ban the Koran. Outlaw 'expressions of Islam that conflict with public order', introduce preventive detention for 'radical Muslims' and remove Dutch nationality from criminals with dual passports. VVD – Tougher integration criteria including an entrance exam for migrants. Provide more safe accommodation in regions closer to refugees' home countries. Restrict social security for migrants; no basic welfare or eligibility for Dutch passports for first 10 years. D66 – Focus on selection of refugees on Europe's borders to deter economic migrants; give asylum seekers language lessons from day 1 and reduce barriers to work to speed up integration. CDA – Revoke permission to stay for migrants who refuse to take part in citizenship programmes; offer more language lessons through volunteers and public broadcasters; tackle discrimination in education and the jobs market. SP – Faster, clearer asylum procedure; distribute refugees fairly among countries; tackle the global causes of asylum, such as war, economic inequality and tax evasion. GroenLinks – More protection for children seeking asylum and those persecuted for their sexual identity. Improve language tuition and give asylum seekers language lessons from day 1. Tackle causes of war and poverty with peacekeeping missions and development aid. Improve conditions for animals in ritual slaughterhouses. PvdA – Speed up asylum cases to ensure those whose claims receive support sooner while the rest are sent home. Size of asylum centres should be appropriate for the local community. Better protection for children in the asylum system, such as considering their applications separately from their parents. 50Plus – Distribute asylum seekers around Europe based on population density. More checks at Dutch border and security on European borders. Migrants eligible for Dutch passports after 10 years, depending on language skills and a 'good behaviour' certificate from the council. Tougher penalties for people smugglers. Extra police officers to detect and tackle radicalisation. CU – Binding Europe-wide agreements to house asylum seekers and repatriate rejected applicants. Improve accommodation and make it easier for refugees to stay in one place. Organise language classes and allow voluntary work or work placements from day 1. SGP – More accommodation in asylum seekers' home region. Stricter rules on family reunion to allow selection based on age, income and marital status. Tighter deadlines on appeals against asylum decisions to reduce serial applications. PvdD – Increase international development aid budget to 1% of national income. Improve conditions in refugee camps in war-torn regions and raise financial contribution to UNHCR. Work within EU to ensure all countries take in a fair share of asylum seekers. All asylum applications in Netherlands to be processed within two years. Denk – Create a Ministry for Reciprocal Acceptance and monitor how migrants are accepted in the community rather than setting targets for integration. Set up a register to record racist incidents and set diversity quotas for women and minorities. Retrain 1000 police officers to focus on racism and discrimination. Speed up asylum procedure and allow refugees to work and study sooner. VNL – Strict 'Australian-style' migration policy so only those who contribute to the economy are allowed in. Close mosques where violence is preached. Accommodate asylum seekers outside the Netherlands.  More >

Miffy the rabbit creator Dick Bruna dies

Dick Bruna, who created Miffy the rabbit, dies at the age of 89 Dick Bruna, the Utrecht artist behind the globally successful Miffy the rabbit children’s books, has died at the age of 89. Bruna died peacefully in his sleep, his publisher said on Friday. He had not been seen in public for several years and brought out the last book about Miffy in 2011. Bruna wrote and illustrated 124 books as well as designing posters and other book covers plus work for charities as diverse as Unicef and World Aids Day. Books about Miffy, known as Nijntje in Dutch, were translated into over 50 languages and Bruna sold some 85 million books during his life, news agency ANP said. The first was published in 1955. The artist also had his own museum, the Dick Bruna Huis, in Utrecht. Marja Kerkhof, director of Bruna's publisher Mercis, told broadcaster NOS: 'I had such an enormous admiration for his work that representing his business interests was easy. It is an honour to introduce his work to adults and children all over the world.'  More >

Healthcare bill is really €700 higher

Kraft Heinz withdraws bid for Unilever, citing ‘amicable agreement’ The average Dutch adult spent an additional €711 on healthcare in 2015, on top of the cost of his or her healthcare premiums of around €1,200, the national statistics office CBS said on Friday. The extra money was mainly due to the excess charge of €360 (now €385), plus visits to the dentist and the cost of medicine, the CBS said. Medical aids and contributions towards residential care also added to the bill. Many drugs, such as sleeping pills and antacids are no longer included in the basic health insurance package. People now pay 34% of the cost of medicines out of their own pocket, compared with 20% in 2000, the CBS said. Excluding premiums, the Dutch paid an extra €9.7bn towards the cost of their healthcare, or 11% of the total bill, the CBS said. The figures do not include the 'employer contribution' which the self-employed have to pay on top of their regular premiums.  More >